News & Reviews News Wire Sound Transit begins pre-revenue testing on East Link light rail line

Sound Transit begins pre-revenue testing on East Link light rail line

By Trains Staff | November 1, 2023

| Last updated on February 2, 2024

Personnel training, equipment testing is step toward 2024 opening

Email Newsletter

Get the newest photos, videos, stories, and more from Trains.com brands. Sign-up for email today!

Map of Seattle-area light rail routes
Pre-revenue testing is beginning on part of Sound Transit’s East Link light rail line (the portion at right, in solid blue) as of Nov. 1, 2023. Sound Transit

BELLEVUE, Wash. — Sound Transit will begin pre-revenue testing on a portion of its East Link light rail line starting today (Nov. 1, 2023), a step toward the beginning of service between the South Bellevue and Redmond Technology stations next spring.

The transit agency cautions that pedestrians and drivers should be alert for trains at any time of the day or night as training begins for operators and maintenance workers, as well as continued testing of the route and equipment.

The move is a step toward opening an isolated portion of the East Link project, also known as the 2 Line. Sound Transit made the decision earlier this year to move toward opening that portion of the line without waiting for the portion along Interstate 90 that will run from South Belleview to connect to the existing light rail system at the International District/Chinatown station. That portion of the route is not expected to be ready until 2025 because of construction problems that required rebuilding or repairs on and around a floating bridge across Lake Washington [see “Construction delays push back opening …,” Trains News Wire, Aug. 22, 2022].

2 thoughts on “Sound Transit begins pre-revenue testing on East Link light rail line

  1. I have not seen any of the press here in Seattle ask any questions about the I-90 floating bridge portion of the line that is being delayed. Sound Transit was boasting during construction that the bridge would have unique engineering that had never been done before. I can help but wonder if the ‘unique engineering’ doesn’t actually work as intended and they are trying to figure out a way to make it work. But as I said, no one in the press seems to be asking Sound Transit that question, they just take the official line that the contractor did the work wrong at face value.

You must login to submit a comment