About 195 people will lose their jobs as UP closes its Hinkle locomotive shop and warehouse over the next two months. In the last year, dozens of jobs have been lost at the rail yard as UP has implemented its “Unified Plan 2020,” a initiative spokesperson Tim McMahan says will help “streamline” the railroad’s operations. The railroad recently shuttered its hump operations at Hinkle as well.
“The workforce reduction is the result of accelerating (UP’s) continuous improvement plan and implementing Precision Scheduled Railroading principles,” McMahan tells Trains News Wire. “These steps are part of Unified Plan 2020, which streamlines operations as we ensure Union Pacific remains a strong and competitive company.”
McManhan says that some “limited operations” would continue at Hinkle, but declined to elaborate on what that means. Other switching operations have been moved to yards in Portland; Nampa and Pocatello, Idaho; Spokane, Wash.; and Ogden, Utah.
It’s unclear how many people will remained employed at the Hinkle yard and McMahan says the railroad would not share that data publically. Hermiston Mayor David Drotzmann tells the East Oregonian newspaper that he believes 40 to 45 people will remained employed at Hinkle.
Local politicians have blasted the decision to shutter the shop at Hinkle. In a letter to UP President and CEO Lance M. Fritz, Oregon’s two U.S. Senators, Ron Wyden and Jeffrey A. Merkley, wrote that the decision to close the locomotive shop would devastate the local economy.
“As UP adopts the Precision Scheduled Railroading model to reduce operating ratios, cutting rural workforce and facilities, there are many cautionary tales where this strategy has not performed well over the long term,” the senators wrote. “We are deeply concerned about rural Oregon economies and your company’s actions (risks) destabilizing already fragile communities.”
“While the company has substantial resources to reinvest and modify operations over time, many of these workers and their families are not so fortunate,” they concluded.
Railroads do not exist to gaurantee you a job. If you got one there, it’s because they needed you. If at some point they need fewer employees, they cut some of those NON-gauranteed jobs, it’s the cycle of all businesses.
Union Pacific should be ashamed of itself , if it wasn’t for dedicated employees their wouldn’t be a railroad , and I don’t see the upper management getting their hands dirty and going into the trenches to do actual work , their just pencil pushers and book keepers ,the maintenance workers , engineers and conductors are the backbone of all railroads period !
Union Pacific should be ashamed of itself.
Its about (My pinion) Locomotives and equipment has statistically gone farther, and longer without need for maintenance, not including the old sh.. that’s out there Still. They’re building them better, faster, stronger!!! Its cost GE less $ now to build a more expensive loco now, and WHY? Cuz they went to TX, no union and cheap home depot parkin lot labor. In my field, aviation, The same helicopter and Aircraft built 24 years ago Can NOT fly longer and farther between heavy maintenance now as does an EXACT copy of that airframe built now. F3 vs GE whatever the numbers are now. EMD got off the porch a LONG time ago cuz they couldn’t play with the big boys.
Capacity destruction is a risky business strategy (see tunnel collapse and landslide on siskiyu line). A reasonable amount of redundancy is a necessary cost to cover the unknown but inevitable arrival of extreme weather, equipment failure/accident, seasonal traffic spikes or diverted traffic etc. One would think the recent, and on-going extreme weather on the Great Plains, would commend themselves to the bean counters. Moreover,the growth of the Asia-Pacific trade will require more support, not less.
Aren’t they unveiling an employee pride unit here soon? Called “Powered by our People”? A little ironic…
So what shops will they have left?