News & Reviews News Wire Maryland withholding funds from DC Metro in ongoing dispute NEWSWIRE

Maryland withholding funds from DC Metro in ongoing dispute NEWSWIRE

By Angela Cotey | August 1, 2019

| Last updated on November 3, 2020

Get a weekly roundup of the industry news you need.

Email Newsletter

Get the newest photos, videos, stories, and more from Trains.com brands. Sign-up for email today!

WMATA

WASHINGTON — Maryland is withholding $56 million for the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority in an ongoing funding dispute, the Washington Post reports.

DC Metro General Manager has sent Maryland officials a letter asking them to release the funds, saying the agency’s credit rating could be damaged. The money was supposed to be released July 1, and is earmarked for new trains and buses. But state Transportation Secretary Pete Rahn says the agency is “stonewalling” on audits and failing to account for its spending.

Officially, Maryland is withholding the money because a capital funding agreement between the transit agency and the three jurisdictions that provide funding — Maryland, Virginia, and the District of Columbia — expired on June 30. But Virginia and the District continued funding because they felt the parties were close to agreement on a one-year extension.

But the Post reports that the move also appears to reflect a desire by Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan, a Republican, to send a political message to Metro and to Maryland Democrats. Hogan has been a vocal critic of Metro and says the state spends too much on transit, rather than roads, and is fighting with Democratic legislators over a plan to add toll lanes in the state’s Washington suburbs.

2 thoughts on “Maryland withholding funds from DC Metro in ongoing dispute NEWSWIRE

  1. GOP or DNC, it doesn’t matter. Asking for audit results is not a bad thing when there is an apparent lack of transparency in a public agency. If you don’t want to give the gov an excuse to build roads, then provide the audit.

    As far as Maryland goes, make sure you include a rider in the funding agreement that requires a qualified audit before the funds get turned over. Then you won’t get into these silly squabbles when the money is ready to move.

You must login to submit a comment