News & Reviews News Wire Panel’s report says ‘safety is not the priority’ at MBTA NEWSWIRE

Panel’s report says ‘safety is not the priority’ at MBTA NEWSWIRE

By Angela Cotey | December 10, 2019

| Last updated on November 3, 2020

Group brought in after June derailments issues lengthy list of recommendations

Email Newsletter

Get the newest photos, videos, stories, and more from Trains.com brands. Sign-up for email today!

MBTA_Report_Hartley
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority equipment sits outside the Riverside Shops in Newton, Mass., in 2011. A new report is highly critical of MBTA practices saying safety is not a priority. It said the issues primarily exist with transit operations, rather than commuter rail.
Scott A. Hartley
MBTA

BOSTON — A highly critical report commissioned in the wake of a series of incidents earlier this year says “safety is not the priority” at the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority.

The report released Monday, by a panel brought in by the MBTA’s Fiscal and Management Control Board, found that MBTA staff believes “fiscal controls over the years may have gone too far, which coupled with staff cutting has resulted in the inability to accomplish required maintenance and inspections, or has hampered work keeping legacy system assets fully functional.”

The three-member panel included former U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood; Carolyn Flowers, former acting administrator of the Federal Transportation Agency, and Carmen Bianco, former president of MTA’s New York City Transit. They were asked to assess MBTA operations in the wake of incidents including two derailments in a four-day span in June: a light-rail accident on the Green Line [see “Ten injured in MBTA light rail derailment,” Trains News Wire, June 9, 2019] and a Red Line derailment that caused signal-system damage that delayed operations for months [see “MBTA Red Line subway derailment injures one, disrupts morning commute,” Trains News Wire, June 11, 2019].

The group interviewed more than 100 executives, employees, and other individuals involved with the MBTA, contract commuter rail operator Keolis, the FTA, Federal Railroad Administration and other organizations. They said the agency “performs the necessary core functions to be considered a relatively safe system,” but some items “need immediate attention.”

Its report states that “the T’s approach to safety is questionable, which results in safety culture concerns. In almost every area we examined, deficiencies in policies, application of safety standards or industry best practices, and accountability were apparent.”

Critical preventative maintenance and inspections are not taking place, the report states, and “there is no meaningful [quality assurance/quality control] strategy or system in place.” It also found that the frequent meetings of the Fiscal and Management Control Board, required to by law to meet 36 times a year, eat up staff time “and leave staff little if any time to tend to the operation or maintenance of the system.”

It also noted that the commuter rail operation is “performing well and does not face many of the challenges that were identified on the transit side of the house.” It attributed this in part to well-defined FRA regulations with fiscal consequences.

In all, the 69-page report includes 34 recommendations covering 61 corrective actions. The full report is available here.

The Boston Globe reports that Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker said at a Monday news conference that his administration was “glad to have” the report and “anxious to implement it.” He acknowledged the agency will need more money and manpower to act on the recommendations.

MBTA General Manager Steve Poftak called the panel’s findings “a very sobering report.” He said he will ask the board at its next meeting to reallocate roughly $10 million to hire safety and quality-control workers.

“We understood the gravity of this report,” Poftak said, according to the Globe report, “and everyone understands the need to change the culture at the T.”

4 thoughts on “Panel’s report says ‘safety is not the priority’ at MBTA NEWSWIRE

  1. Photo caption is wrong. Riverside shop is in Newton,.

    I’ll eave it to ROBERT McGUIRE to comment on the substance of the blog. I’m quite confident ROBERT will have something of interest to say.

  2. This sentence has me wanting an English teacher to give the writer an “F” for writing.

    The report released Monday, by a panel brought in by the MBTA’s Fiscal and Management Control Board, found that MBTA staff believes “fiscal controls over the years may have gone too far, which coupled with staff cutting has resulted in the inability to accomplish required maintenance and inspections, or has happened work keeping legacy system assets fully function.”

    What does …or has happened work keeping legacy system assets fully function….mean?

  3. It is unfair to paint all MBTA employees as deadbeats. Of course there are some, but show me any public or private sector employer without any whatsoever. I do a lot of work with the MBTA on the design and construction side, and have found them to be dedicated and hard working public servants. They truly love what they do, and care about delivering reliable and dependable service. The agency has been on a legislative starvation diet for 20 years, and we’re now paying the consequences.

  4. Of course I do Charles. Since the MBTA is the commuter/transit agency that I see and use the most it is my favorite whipping boy. (Well, since I just came back last night from a trip to Lancaster, PA on Amtrak’s Acela and Keystone Service, Metro North comes pretty close.) I doubt if there are not enough people to conduct safety training and do inspections. The MBTA is has far too many employees, both management and union. This is like all government agencies. And it is unlikely to change because if layoffs are threatened then the local bottom feeding politicians get up in arms and threaten dire consequences. The problem is how do you get these deadbeats to work (employees not politicians, better that politicians don’t work). There again it appears that making people work is against their contract or job description. Then when one of these “expert” panels (waste of money in the first place) makes recommendations, management takes the easy way out and hires more employees. And who pays that bill? You guessed it, the riders and the taxpayers. So now you have two groups of people, those who work and those who don’t. And those who do work are mad at those who don’t. They quit and now you have to hire more people to cover for those who don’t work. MBTA is in a death spiral. The commuter rail side should not be off the hook either. Didn’t they just have two incidents where a train left the station with a door that wasn’t closed? And didn’t a train become uncoupled while moving? The MBTA is lucky that someone didn’t get hurt or killed in those incidents. You could go on and on.

    Have a nice day Charles.

You must login to submit a comment