News & Reviews News Wire UP CEO Lance Fritz: Railroad still doesn’t need Brazos Yard switching capacity NEWSWIRE

UP CEO Lance Fritz: Railroad still doesn’t need Brazos Yard switching capacity NEWSWIRE

By Bill Stephens | November 25, 2019

| Last updated on November 3, 2020

Get a weekly roundup of the industry news you need.

Email Newsletter

Get the newest photos, videos, stories, and more from Trains.com brands. Sign-up for email today!

LanceFritz
UP CEO Lance Fritz
Union Pacific
NEW YORK CITY — Industrial products traffic has been a lone bright spot for Union Pacific this year as plastics, petrochemical, and construction-related carload volume has continued to grow on the U.S. Gulf Coast.

But UP has reduced car handlings enough through Precision Scheduled Railroading that it still does not need the additional switching capacity Brazos Yard would bring to Texas, CEO Lance Fritz told Trains last week.

UP in the spring stopped work on the new classification yard being built near Hearne, Texas, at the strategic junction of seven main lines. It diverted Brazos Yard funding to building and extending passing sidings, as well as a block-swapping yard in Santa Teresa, N.M., so it could run longer trains across the Sunset Route in California, Arizona, and New Mexico.

UP began building the $550 million Brazos Yard in early 2018 and expected it to open by early 2020 to handle growing volumes on the U.S. Gulf Coast, as well as cross-border traffic headed to and from Mexico.

Instead, UP hit the pause button because Unified Plan 2020, the railroad’s version of Precision Scheduled Railroading, aims to reduce the number of times cars are switched en route.

The reduction in car handling has siphoned enough switching volume out of the network that UP has been able to idle the humps at Hinkle, Ore., Pine Bluff, Ark., Proviso Yard in Chicago, and Neff Yard in Kansas City, Mo. UP also has consolidated yards across its system, including in Salt Lake City, Denver, Louisiana, and Missouri.

Fritz says keeping Brazos Yard construction on hold is a prudent capital allocation decision in light of the railroad’s continued gains in operational efficiency.

The railroad had touted Brazos as the single largest capital project in its history, and officials had said the yard would boast the lowest operating costs of any switching facility on its system.

UP Chief Operating Officer Jim Vena has said there’s nothing wrong with hump yards. They’re the most efficient way to classify traffic, he says, as long as the yard is in the right place and has sufficient daily volume.

4 thoughts on “UP CEO Lance Fritz: Railroad still doesn’t need Brazos Yard switching capacity NEWSWIRE

  1. At the present, and for the time being, yes Brazos may not be needed. But, that will not last forever. In time it WILL be needed. There will come a time when Houston’s complexity will cause service troubles for both UP and KCS and something will have to be done, lest things become a Davidson style mess.

  2. They have lost a ton, pardon the pun, of business. No wonder they don’t need the yard capacity. Railroading is a no growth industry. They are enjoying profits in a diminishing market for their mediocre service.

  3. Double tracking the Sunset is probably a better use of capital at this point. However, if they really want to compete with BNSF between Chicago & LA, they me eventually need to double track the Golden State Route too.

  4. It might not make sense right now to complete Brazos, but UP better hold some capital on the side to build this yard.. The need will come in the future

You must login to submit a comment