News & Reviews News Wire Amtrak filing in Sunset Limited case says UP has failed to preserve key information

Amtrak filing in Sunset Limited case says UP has failed to preserve key information

By David Lassen | April 11, 2024

Passenger operator petitions STB to require railroad to retain dispatching records

Email Newsletter

Get the newest photos, videos, stories, and more from Trains.com brands. Sign-up for email today!

Passenger train stopped at station platform under blue skies
The Sunset Limited pauses at Houston in June 2021. The latest development in the STB investigation into the train’s timekeeping has seen Amtrak claim Union Pacific is failing to preserve key dispatching information needed for the case. Bob Johnston

WASHINGTON — Union Pacific is not preserving dispatching information relevant to its handling of the Sunset Limited, Amtrak has claimed in a new filing with the Surface Transportation Board that asks the board to order UP to show cause why the railroad is not complying with an STB order to do so.

The “petition to show cause” filed on Wednesday, April 10, is the latest twist in the slow-moving investigation over Sunset Limited timekeeping, the first such case brought by Amtrak to the STB under the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 [see “Amtrak asks federal regulators to investigate …,” Trains News Wire, Dec. 9, 2022].

The filing says that UP destroys its dispatch playbacks — videos providing information about dispatching decisions — after 99 hours, and that UP claims it is under no obligation to preserve those playbacks. Amtrak says this does not comply with the terms set by the board when it set the terms for its investigation last July [see “STB announces investigation …,” News Wire, July 11, 2023]. As quoted by Amtrak, the board’s order called for the preservation of all documents or data related to the subject “regardless of any parties’ ongoing document retention policy or other data destruction practices … even if they claim those documents or data are protected from discovery by privilege or otherwise.”

The filing argues the board should order UP to show why it concluded its dispatching playbacks were not covered by those instructions, immediately end its policy of destroying the dispatching playbacks for the duration of the Sunset Limited case, and says Amtrak “reserves the right to seek additional and appropriate relief” for the railroad’s failure to comply with the board order.

Insight about dispatching decisions is likely to be critical, given that questions whether the railroad honors Amtrak’s statutory right of preference or gives its freight trains priority are likely to be at the heart of the case. Union Pacific has complained in an earlier filing about the difficulty in documenting past operating decisions [see “Union Pacific seeks more time …,” News Wire, March 30, 2024]. The loss of information provided by the playbacks would appear to only make the investigation more difficult.

The full filing covers 255 pages, although the show-cause petition covers just the first 13 pages. The remainder is exhibits, including some redacted in their entirety as “highly confidential.” Others document the back-and-forth between Amtrak and Union Pacific in Amtrak’s requests for information. This includes UP statements that “it does not possess dispatching playback documents for the relevant period” of specific requests, as well as frequent responses that Amtrak requests are “overbroad and unduly burdensome.”

5 thoughts on “Amtrak filing in Sunset Limited case says UP has failed to preserve key information

  1. So, how about telling us exactly what a “dispatching playback” is?

    Video of trackline view? Microphone on dispatcher? What?

    The data from the dispatch system is most certainly saved for years. So is the dispatchers radio recording.

    1. I think your answer is on page 2 of the petition, which is linked in the story: “Dispatch playbacks are videos that provide valuable evidence about dispatching decisions and train conflict resolution. They allow the viewer to quickly and reliably determine how a dispatching railroad prioritizes trains and uses available infrastructure. They also provide information about train movements that may not otherwise appear in electronic data, such as movements by foreign trains, light engine movements, and blocks of cars.”

  2. The issue of dispatching records and Amtrak accounting have absolutely nothing to do with one another.

    1. Actually, this is like the pot calling the kettle black. For years, Congress and the GAO has asked for Amtrak to give a detailed accounting of how it accounts for the actual costs of running the Northeast Corridor in relation to how it accounts for the costs of running long distance and state supported passenger travel. To date, only flim-flamming answers have been given. Why is Amtrak not guilty of failing to give this key information to those who have a federal mandate to know EVERY DETAIL of their GAP’s so that every American subsidizing Amtrak can understand what is going on and why Amtrak cannot meet the demands of its federal charter but can continue to pay executive bonuses for what amounts to ineptness by the same. In this case, Amtrak Leadership MUST be replaced and a new board installed with defined responsibilities and accounting in place so there is no ducking of responsibilities when they are not met… If there was ever an organization that should be managed by Operating Ratio, it is Amtrak!!!

      This fish stinks from the head (Stephen Gardner) on down. (the other paid leadership who can’t find their rear ends with both hands and a flashlight!)

You must login to submit a comment