News & Reviews News Wire Amtrak to meet with Chicago officials about Union Station Greyhound proposal

Amtrak to meet with Chicago officials about Union Station Greyhound proposal

By Trains Staff | August 14, 2024

Letter from Amtrak president suggests locations adjacent to two Metra stations as alternatives

Email Newsletter

Get the newest photos, videos, stories, and more from Trains.com brands. Sign-up for email today!

Exterior of a station building
Amtrak and Chicago officials will meet about a proposal to move Greyhound service to a street outside Chicago Union Station. David Lassen

CHICAGO — Amtrak officials will meet with representatives of the city of Chicago after again voicing concerns about the prospect that the area adjacent to Chicago Union Station could be asked to serve as the temporary hub for Greyhound bus service.

After Amtrak President Roger Harris sent a letter on Tuesday, Aug. 13, to Mayor Brandon Johnson and Transportation Commissioner Thomas Carney — expressing “significant concerns” with use of a section of Jackson Boulevard next to Union Station and presenting bus facilities next to two Metra stations as alternatives —Carlos Ramirez-Rosa, alderman for Chicago’s 35th ward, intervened today to set up a meeting, an Amtrak spokesman said in an email.

A date for the meeting has yet to be determined.

Greyhound is likely to be displaced from its current downtown depot this fall, and the city has indicated it considers the Union Station area the best place to relocate the intercity bus service on a temporary basis. Amtrak in a statement last week, said it had not been contacted about that plan and expressed concern about congestion in the area, among other issues [see “Chicago may ask Union Station to house Greyhound passengers,” Trains News Wire, Aug. 9, 2024].

Harris’ letter noted the “significant security and facility costs” that Amtrak, the owner and operator of Union Station, would likely incur from “the use of our station by hundreds of new daily intercity bus customers. Without an agreement to appropriately compensate us and mitigate any impacts, these costs and impacts would be borne by Amtrak and our customers — and indirectly by Metra and our other tenants who share in our expenses at the facility.” Harris also cited congestion, capacity, and community concerns about “crime, traffic congestion, and increased demand for services.”

The letter and an accompanying PowerPoint presentation offered two alternative sites:

— Two protected bus lanes under the Oglivie Transportation Center on Washington Boulevard, the terminal for Metra’s three Union Pacific lines, as well as 13 bus routes and two CTA rail lines. The rail station, at 500 W. Madison St., shares its address with the 42-story Accenture Tower and has a number of shops and restaurants.

— A bus lane adjacent to Metra’s LaSalle Street station at 414 S. LaSalle. That terminal for the Rock Island District is far less developed than either Union Station or Oglivie, but has a bus lane on Financial Place used by only one CTA route. (A dozen others are nearby, as are several CTA rail lines.)

“These locations — and others — would certainly provide a safer experience and improved accomodations for incercity bus riders than that block of Jackson Boulevard,” Harris wrote.

A Metra spokesman said today his agency had just received the letter and had no comment at this time.

2 thoughts on “Amtrak to meet with Chicago officials about Union Station Greyhound proposal

  1. Move Greyhound to METRA LaSalle Street? Couldn’t be any worse than what’s there now.

    METRA RAIL has let LaSalle Street “Station” on its Rock Island District fester as if a third-world bus station. Seems good enough for what’s likely METRA’s lowest income, most heavily minority contingent of passengers.

    As for CUS, I’m sure that Amtrak will eventually give in to Chicago politicians who will be supported on January 20th of next year by the incoming federal administration.

  2. How quickly we forget. When Megabus initially entered the Chicago market, bus passengers crowded inside the Canal Street entrance of CUS to wait for their bus. This action made it difficult for Amtrak and Metra passengers to gain entrance or exit, particularly during rush hours. As well, the bus contingency required additional police officers and housekeeping efforts.

    As downtown was not designed to be for curbside pick-up, let Megabus pay the city to use a bus bay at the CTA bus turnaround, across from CUS. It is not acceptable to enable a bus line to hype its lower fares by mooching off of other operations, particularly if competitive to Greyhound.

You must login to submit a comment