News & Reviews News Wire CPKC and CSX urge regulators to reject NS request for pause in review of Meridian & Bigbee transactions

CPKC and CSX urge regulators to reject NS request for pause in review of Meridian & Bigbee transactions

By Bill Stephens | October 27, 2023

NS only wants to delay the launch of a new competitive route linking the Southeast and Mexico, CPKC says

Email Newsletter

Get the newest photos, videos, stories, and more from Trains.com brands. Sign-up for email today!

The Meridian & Bigbee acquisition will allow CSX and CPKC to interchange directly in Alabama. CSX and CPKC

WASHINGTON – Canadian Pacific Kansas City and CSX Transportation told the Surface Transportation Board today that there’s no reason to grant Norfolk Southern’s request for a delay in review of their proposals to create a new through route linking the Southeast and Mexico via Myrtlewood, Ala.

Earlier this month CPKC and CSX filed separate applications seeking STB approval to acquire and operate Genesee & Wyoming short line Meridian & Bigbee, which is the missing link between the CPKC system at Meridian, Miss., and the CSX network at Burkeville, Ala., just west of Montgomery, Ala. The Meridian & Bigbee, or MNBR, owns the 50.4-mile route west of Myrtlewood and leases from CSX the 107 miles between Myrtlewood and Burkville. MNBR operates the 10 miles between Burkeville and Montgomery via overhead trackage rights on CSX.

CPKC subsidiary Kansas City Southern will acquire the 50.4-mile segment of the MNBR between Meridian and Myrtlewood, which it’s calling the Western Line. MNBR will continue to provide local service on the route after the transaction.

In a separate transaction, CSX will resume operations on its line between Myrtlewood and Burkville, Ala. – dubbed the Eastern Line – which has been leased to MNBR since 2003. As part of that transaction, MNBR will cease operations on the Eastern Line.

NS, in a regulatory filing this week, said the CPKC and CSX applications should be considered a single deal with potentially wide-ranging impacts. As such, the STB should pause review of the transactions and require CPKC and CSX to file a single, consolidated application, NS said.

“These are separate transactions that involve different parties and thus require separate Board authority,” CSX told the board today. “There is no consolidated transaction that requires Board authorization. The separate filings requiring separate Board authority were structured consistent with the Board’s rules and precedent. Norfolk Southern points to no precedent requiring a single, unified application and no rules that would even govern such an unprecedented filing.”

CSX noted that its recent acquisition of Pan Am Railways involved multiple, separate but related transactions.

CPKC said that NS was simply trying to delay the creation of a new competitive route.

“The Board should not delay the CPKC transaction on the basis of NS’s disingenuous request,” CPKC said in a filing today. “NS knows that the CPKC-MNBR transaction is unambiguously procompetitive and in the public interest. The CPKC transaction will support a more efficient direct connection between CPKC’s network and the CSXT network for traffic moving to and from the Southeast United States.”

Between the KCS hub at Shreveport, La., and Meridian the CPKC-CSX interline service would rely on the Meridian Speedway, the KCS-NS joint venture that dates to 2006, and would compete head-to-head with existing NS-CPKC interline moves in the corridor.

“When NS invested in the Meridian Speedway it understood fully that the route would continue to support a potential procompetitive connection to CSXT’s network, not just NS’s,” CPKC said. “The newly invigorated rail service that CPKC is pursuing via this transaction is an outgrowth of the Board’s approval of the CP/KCS transaction, which for example enabled the combined CPKC system to offer improved transportation solutions – and thereby to compete more effectively against its much larger rivals – for traffic of automotive manufacturers and parts suppliers.”

CPKC said NS would prefer that CSX and CPKC interchange routes remain less efficient. “But granting NS’s request to hold the CPKC-MNBR transaction in abeyance would disserve the interests of shippers in the creation of improved competitive routing options and the broader public interest in investments that augment the strength of the U.S. rail network,” CPKC said.

Any delay in the regulatory review would postpone shippers’ ability to tap a newly competitive route at a time when new auto assembly plants are being built in the Southeast and the automakers are evaluating their rail transportation options, CPKC said.

CPKC also noted that the combined transactions will streamline operations at Meridian and therefore would have no adverse effect on the Meridian Speedway or existing or new Amtrak service.

10 thoughts on “CPKC and CSX urge regulators to reject NS request for pause in review of Meridian & Bigbee transactions

  1. Why is CPkc doing all the talking for CSX? Is CSX not capable of articulating their own opinions or is this more important to CPkc than it is to CSX. I agree with Daniel and Michael. CSX/CPkc should fork over to NS what NS spent to make this trackage worth anything in the first place. Of course, CP having just spent 31 BILLION for KCS, which has capacity problems everywhere, can’t afford doesn’t feel the need to pay their share in upping KCS’s trackage rights anywhere, especially in Shreveport or in Houston…

  2. Perhaps the temperature of this kerfuffle would lower to a simmer if CPKC wrote a check to NS for the $350 million that NS spent up front to make the KCS trackage a “Super Speedway”.

  3. Norfolk Southern and Union Pacific have a competitive route to the Meridian Speedway. This alternate route runs from Chattanooga to Memphis through Huntsville and Sheffield, Alabama over NS; and Memphis to Dallas/Fort Worth through Little Rock, Texarkana, and Longview over UP.

    Chattanooga is a major NS hub with routes from Cincinnati, Washington, Atlanta, and Jacksonville. Chattanooga and Huntsville have Volkswagon and Toyota assembly plants respectively located for rail shipments.

  4. The train length restriction likely is meant to ease congestion in Shreveport, where long trains are blocking access to the yard for hours at a time. There is a detailed article in Trains November issue about this problem.

  5. Had no Idea Meridian and Bigbee ran al the way into the Florida panhandle.

    Come on Trains Map guy, and editors… you can do better.

  6. Is it me or is NS seem a little distracted? Caught sleeping on PanAm Southern and now this. I applaud their moves on consolidated rail safety post East Palestine and their efforts to fund remediation in the effected town, so I am not down on them per se, but I do sense they have or are losing sight of the operating ball.

    1. NS was not asleep on the Pan AM transaction they were in position to out bid CSX and offered what they thought it was worth to them.

  7. What a total farce. The dumb railroaders are playing with their little Lionel train sets while the truckers running along Interstate 40 keep laughing all the way to the bank.

    If the dumb railroaders are serious about growing their business, they will find that there is more than enough intermodal business running along I-40 for all of them.

    And for all the railroad apologists in the audience please remember that publicly funded highways come with one very interesting characteristic called OPEN ACCESS.

    1. Check your maps. I-40 runs from west coast thru Amarillo, Little Rock, Memphis, Nashville, to east coast.

      Meridian Speedway is paralleled by I-20. I -20 starts in west Texas thru Dallas, Shreveport, Meridian, Birmingham, Atlanta, to east coast.

  8. In all fairness CSX should foot the bill to lengthen every passing siding between Meridian and Shreveport to 10-12,000 feet. NS would/should have no reason to complain about capex that also benefits them.

You must login to submit a comment