News & Reviews News Wire NTSB chair criticizes FRA’s final rule requiring video cameras on passenger locomotives

NTSB chair criticizes FRA’s final rule requiring video cameras on passenger locomotives

By Bill Stephens | October 12, 2023

The rule mandating installation of inward- and outward-facing cameras doesn’t go far enough because it exempts freight locomotives, Jennifer Homendy says

Email Newsletter

Get the newest photos, videos, stories, and more from Trains.com brands. Sign-up for email today!

picture of one train out of the cab of another
Viewed from the cab of Amtrak HHP8 628, New York-bound train No. 180 meets Acela 2027 at speed at Elizabeth, N.J. Greg McDonnell

WASHINGTON – The Federal Railroad Administration today published its final rule mandating inward- and outward-facing cameras in passenger locomotives, a move that immediately brought criticism from the chair of the National Transportation Safety Board, who said the rule doesn’t go far enough.

The FRA rule, which goes into effect on Nov. 13, will require the installation of the video cameras on all lead locomotives in passenger trains. The rule requires that the devices record while the lead locomotive is moving and that 12 hours of data must be retained in a crashworthy memory module.

The rule also treats the cameras as safety devices under existing regulations, meaning tampering or disabling them is prohibited. The recordings also can be used to conduct operational tests that determine passenger railroad operating employees’ compliance with applicable railroad rules and federal regulations.

“While video recorders cannot directly prevent accidents, they help maintain a higher standard of safety,” FRA Administrator Amit Bose said in a statement. “In addition, these devices play a vital role in post-accident investigations, providing valuable evidence that helps us understand the circumstances leading to the accident and take appropriate action to prevent similar accidents in the future.”

National Transportation Safety Board Chair Jennifer Homendy
But NTSB Chair Jennifer Homendy was disappointed that the FRA rule did not adopt two of the safety board’s recommendations.

“While this is undoubtedly a step forward for passenger rail safety, FRA’s rule falls short of our recommendations in two ways — the first of which is by failing to require audio recorders for passenger trains,” Homendy said in a statement. “We’re also deeply disappointed the rule excludes freight rail entirely. In fact, FRA’s belief that the cost ‘could outweigh the safety benefits’ is an affront to every community that’s experienced a freight or freight-passenger rail disaster.”

Although the FRA didn’t mandate the cameras in freight locomotives, the agency said that “it should be noted that they have been voluntarily installed by freight railroads on a widespread basis.” The Association of American Railroads had opposed requiring cameras on freight locomotives.

The FRA also said that it would continue to monitor freight railroad installation and use of onboard video cameras and that it may take additional action in a separate proceeding.

More than a decade ago the NTSB recommended that FRA require audio and image recorders in all locomotives. The recommendations were prompted by dozens of railroad accident investigations in which NTSB determined having inward- and outward-facing audio and image recorders would have provided crucial information to the railroads, its workforce, FRA, and NTSB that could have improved safety. In a number of those accidents, the operator died, was seriously injured, or could not recall details from moments before the accident.

“Though many in the freight rail industry have opted to install recorders voluntarily, there’s absolutely no standard for the number of hours of data they must preserve after an accident,” Homendy said. “East Palestine [Ohio] is a striking example: instead of having 12 hours’ worth of in-cab video, as we’ve recommended, our investigators only have access to a 20-minute recording — not nearly enough to help us or the FRA identify critical safety improvements needed to prevent similar accidents from reoccurring.”​

The FRA rule exempts freight locomotives from compliance with the regulation when they are pressed into rescue service on the point of a passenger train with a failed locomotive.

The final FRA rule is available online.

6 thoughts on “NTSB chair criticizes FRA’s final rule requiring video cameras on passenger locomotives

  1. What happens when an Amtrak loco craps out, 2nd Amtrak loco inop camera, and only freight replacement loco has no camera?

    1. The FRA rule exempts freight locomotives from compliance with the regulation when they are pressed into rescue service on the point of a passenger train with a failed locomotive.

  2. It should be a standard law on all forms of transportation Not only in locomotives both freight and passenger but also trucks, buses and I know people might howl over this but even cameras as well as a black box in the private automobile as well as taxis and ride share service cars like Uber and Lyft. Having blacks boxes as well as cameras installed in the private automobile will make for safer driving and in case of any mishaps and possible accidents, it can go a long way in solving unexplained accidents as well as clear up any confusion. I would think that having a black box or camera in the automobile will make motorists become more careful drivers and drive safely knowing that their every move is being recorded and is subject to inspection and review.
    Joseph C. Markfelder

  3. With NS providing only 20 minutes of video, this act should have been investigated further. There is a black box type recorder installed on most freight locomotives. Our entire runs were recorded for that very purpose, should an investigation been called for such incidents. Every time the whistle blew for a crossing, locations of said crossing, speed and train handling were recorded. And these people are in Washington? WOW

You must login to submit a comment