News & Reviews News Wire Overview: JD Vance and rail safety

Overview: JD Vance and rail safety

By Caleb Revill | July 29, 2024

Response to East Palestine derailment gained national exposure for Trump’s VP pick

Email Newsletter

Get the newest photos, videos, stories, and more from Trains.com brands. Sign-up for email today!

Man in meeting with small group of people
U.S. Sen. JD Vance (at right) meets with East Palestine, Ohio, residents on Feb. 16, 2023. Office of Sen. JD Vance via Facebook

Before Donald Trump chose Ohio’s JD Vance as his candidate for vice president, the U.S. Marine Corps veteran, lawyer, and author of “Hillbilly Elegy” gained the national spotlight as one of the authors of The Railway Safety Act of 2023. The bipartisan legislation — sponsored by six U.S. Senators, three Republicans and three Democrats —  came in the aftermath of the Feb. 3, 2023, Norfolk Southern derailment and chemical release in East Palestine, Ohio.

“Through this legislation, Congress has a real opportunity to ensure that what happened in East Palestine will never happen again,” Vance said in a statement on his Senate campaign website, referring to the Railway Safety Act of 2023. “We owe every American the peace of mind that their community is protected from a catastrophe of this kind. Action to prevent future disasters is critical, but we must never lose sight of the needs of the Ohioans living in East Palestine and surrounding communities. One day, the TV cameras will leave, and the news cycle will move on, but the needs of those Ohioans will remain. I will never stop fighting to deliver the support they need.”

The legislation includes provisions mandating railroads use defect detectors; reduce the average distance between hotbox detectors from every 25 miles to every 15 miles; expand the types of chemicals that trigger Federal Railroad Administration requirements for trains carrying flammable liquids and other explosives or toxic materials, and improve the U.S. Department of Transportation’s railroad hazmat response.

Additionally, the bill would up the maximum statutory civil penalty from $100,000 to $10 million for Class I railroads that violate rail safety laws. The bill has been stalled due to Republican opposition to some provisions; the House has introduced its own bill with some additiona provisions [see “House rail safety hearing highlights new legislation,” Trains News Wire, July 23, 2024].

With the East Palestine derailment occurring in his state a month after he was sworn in as senator, Vance quickly became a vocal advocate for East Palestine and broader rail safety. He met with members of the community and surveyed the status of environmental cleanup. In a statement released during his visit, Vance called upon President Joe Biden’s administration to fund a long-term health screening program for residents.

“We have to get the long-term health screening in place for residents,” Vance said in the statement published on his website. “If you talk to people, this is people who want to move on from this disaster, this is people are still worried about chemical contamination, they want to know with confidence that 10 years down the road, if something happens to their kids, God forbid, or themselves, they can trace it to this accident or not. …”

During Rail Safety Week in September 2023, Vance was joined by Senators Maria Cantwell, Sherrod Brown, Bob Casey and John Fetterman in drafting a resolution highlighting the need for more rail safety and awareness.

The resolution stated that in the last decade, Class I freight railroads had the highest derailment rate, a 14% increase, and more than 43,000 rail workers have been injured and 135 rail workers have been killed on duty, according to then-preliminary 2022 federal statistics. More recent 10-year rail safety data from the Federal Railroad Administration can be reviewed here.

This article is also appearing at FreightWaves.com. Disclosure: JD Vance is an investor in FreightWaves SONAR through the Rise of the Rest fund.

9 thoughts on “Overview: JD Vance and rail safety

  1. In all the many years I have read Trains this is the first time I remember an article that sounded like a press release for a politician.

    I count this as strike one against new ownership. I depend on magazines like Trains and Model railroader to distract me from the daily stress of our overwrought political times.

    And maybe next time hold off until the bill passes. Nothing really happened here.

    1. MARC and others — Many of the issues discussed in these pages are political, such as Amtrak funding or funding for the bottomless pit of CalHSR. There are many people commenting on these pages who believe that one political party (Democrat) would support Amtrak (public transit, etc.) and the other party (Republican) wouldn’t.

      Other political issues discussed on these pages include New York City’s proposed (and withdrawn) congestion pricing. Sorry, I didn’t wake up this morning and see TRAINS’ first political article.

      Seems that only when a Republican has an opinion or a viewpoint, that there’s criticism for TRAINS becoming political.

      MARC, as far as your comment in the middle of your post, the comment about the new ownership, that’s premature. We know nothing about the new ownership or any changes to the staff or the editorial policies. All we know is (1) Kalmbach no longer owns TRAINS, and (2) Kalmbach’s HQ building in the Town of Brookfield, near Waukesha, Wisconsin, is up for sale.

    2. @Charles Landey:
      You posted: “There are many people commenting on these pages who believe that one political party (Democrat) would support Amtrak (public transit, etc.) and the other party (Republican) wouldn’t.”

      First, the is no such thing as the “Democrat” party. But you already knew that; this is just a backhanded sideswipe while you’re ostensibly trying to play all even-handed. Sorta like Mike Johnson’s “cool the rhetoric” screed. But I digress….

      Second, one can easily see how a disinterested third party might believe that the Democratic Party (its correct name) would support Amtrak, public transit et al., while the Republican Party wouldn’t. Examples abound. Yes, I suppose one could find an occasional outlier; you yourself may indeed be one. But in general, one would be hard pressed to reasonably counter that perception. Want to try?

  2. So he’s an investor in the place that made the article? Might as well say “This article paid for by JD Vance”. Keep the political stuff off TRAINS!

    1. Seeing that Amtrak is federally funded and state funded, and that a significant amount of infrastructure funding in Congress goes to assist railroads in updating their ROW’s, I think it is appropriate for TRAINS to post articles driven out of the beltway (DC) where politician or candidate leanings drive legislation.

      If you think the article is a little too one sided, note: “Vance was joined by Senators Maria Cantwell, Sherrod Brown, Bob Casey and John Fetterman”. All of them Democrats.

      The “Rise of the Rest Fund” is a seed fund and part of the Revolution Funds started by Steve Case (former CEO of America Online). They are seed funding a new supply chain data service called SONAR under the FreightWaves umbrella. And remember Freight Waves is a sister publication to Trains in the Firecrown portfolio.

      Even if this article was discussing Kamala Harris’s discussion on rail safety, I would still want to know. This article doesn’t push the candidate, it pushes the discussion on rail safety and I don’t care if Mickey Mouse was promoting it, it still has merit.

    2. The six original sponsors include both Senators from Ohio (1R + 1D) and both Senators from PA (2 D’s). East Palestie OH is very near the PA-OH border.

  3. The Bill is S 576. It was reported out of the Commerce Committee 12-13-2023 with no action since. There is a companion House bill, HR 1674.

You must login to submit a comment