WASHINGTON — U.S. Rep. Chris Deluzio (D-Pa.) has reintroduced two bills stemming from the East Palestine derailment of 2023 — one broadening the definition of a “high-hazard flammable train” and setting reporting requirements for railroads for derailments involving hazardous materials, and another requiring railroads to reimburse first responders for costs resulting from derailments.
Deluzio (D-Pa.), U.S. Rep Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and 14 other Democratic cosponsors are supporters of the Decreasing Emergency Railroad Accident Instances Locally, or DERAIL, Act. It would define high-hazard trains to include a train with one or more loaded tank cars carrying a Class 3 flammable liquid such as gasoline or ethanol, or one with one or more cars of a Class 2 flammable gas, such as compressed hydrogen, ethylene, or butylene.
It would also require a railroad to report, within 24 hours, any derailment involving a train “carrying material toxic by inhalation” to the National Response Center, as well as state and local officials. Full text of the bill is available here.
Said Deluzio in a press release, “The DERAIL Act that I’m re-introducing with Rep. Khanna today is an important step to finally strengthen our rail regulations and improve rail safety in Western Pennsylvania, East Palestine, and across the country.” Khanna said the bill “will expand our safety regulations and help prevent future tragedies. Leaders from all parties must speak out loudly for better safety regulations.”
A version of the bill introduced in February 2023 died in committee.
Deluzio and U.S. Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.) are sponsors of the Assistance for Local Heroes During Train Crises Act, which would create a new Hazardous Train Event Emergency Reimbursement Fund. It would require railroads and shippers to contribute no less than $10 million annually to the fund through fees determined by the Secretary of Transportation. Emergency response entities would receive reimbursements of not less than $250,000 and up to $3 million following response to a hazardous-materials rail emergency to replace equipment, cover overtime pay, or address other expenses from such an emergency. The full text of the bill is available here.
“It is time to make the railroads pay for the messes they cause in our communities,” Deluzio said in a press release. “… This bill will help communities across the country better prepare for future derailments with improved information-sharing and will cover the cost of damaged equipment, overtime pay, and more—all paid for by the companies that ship and carry these materials.” Fitzgerald said the bill will “ensure real accountability and give first responders the support they deserve. When crisis strikes, first responders step up—we must do the same for them.”
The earlier version of the bill, introduced in April 2023, failed to advance beyond the House Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, and Hazardous Materials.
So true Mr. Raimondi, the R’s (Patriotic named) plan is to make the RR’s pay for the communities emergency svcs which they, Lying Donald & the homely S. African garden gnome are going to eliminate.
Sorry Galen, but the first legislation, DERAIL is dead on arrival. All that stuff they want is already happening as a result of East Palestine. This is just grand standing to add more costly regulation that will not increase safety. Why do you think it failed to get out of committee last year. I agree with the premise of the Assistance for Local Heroes act, but I think it should be based on an aggregate of actual costs over the past, say four years, not just throwing out a floor number of 200K. Suppose all that was needed was someone monitoring a slow leaking tank car with a hose until it could be off loaded by a specialist group. We will pay 200,000 bucks for that service? Might cost several thousand tops. All I am saying is that we don’t need to be buying new equipment for someone every time there is an incident. If there are losses because of an incident then by all means. But costs should be more to actual, not pie in the sky…
What about when truck accidents occur as they do more times than you think. Do they reimburse First Responders also?
Raymond,
In PA, First Responders are allowed to bill for their costs in Truck HM situations. I believe many of the states have similar law. So even if the Federal Law is silent on this, if every state would have its law allowing for recovery the lack of a federal law isn’t that critical.