High-horsepower, six-axle road locomotives are generally regarded to be units making between 3,800 to 4,400 hp. Over the last four decades the horsepower output has steadily grown to the high end of this range for the majority of the North American locomotives built. When this threshold was first reached with EMDs SD60 at 3,800 hp and General Electric’s C39-8 at 3,900 hp during the 1980s, standard cabs were on the verge of elimination. This meant relatively few road units in this horsepower range were ever built with standard cabs.
Some railroads, like Santa Fe, never purchased any six-axle, high-horsepower road power with standard cabs, while Norfolk Southern was one of the last Class I railroads to begin ordering comfort cabs. With the recent retirement of Canadian National’s remaining Dash 8 fleet, which dominated iron ore service in Minnesota, finding this type of unit in regular mainline duties, outside of local service, has become harder to do. Here’s a survey of the Class I railroads and whether they still roster any such units.
Standard-cab, 3,800- to 4,400-hp locomotives still in operation
BNSF: No high horsepower standard cab locomotives left.
Canadian National: Still rosters former Illinois Central SD70s and former Oakway Leasing SD60s in active service. These can be seen on regional trains primarily in the Midwest. Its remaining fleet of former Union Pacific C40-8s are stored and their chances to return to service are low.
CPKC: Uses many former Soo Line SD60s in secondary mainline service, primarily in the United States.
CSX: Reacquired a number of its own C40-8s when it purchased Pan Am Railway a few years ago. These typically see service on former Pan Am main lines but are slowly being scrapped.
Norfolk Southern: No high horsepower standard cab locomotives left. Most of its standard cabs were converted to comfort cab-equipped SD60Es, SD70ACCs, and AC44C6Ms.
Union Pacific: Still rosters a handful of SD60s, but only sees occasional mainline duties.
Wikipedia is a super and free site for curated information. Well worth supporting financially!
This entry may help understanding the “comfort cab” definition:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comfort_cab
It would helpful to me, and maybe other non-railroaders, to describe the differences between a standard cab and the comfort cab.
I can seduce that 1. they tend to be more comfortable. Better insulation? Less vibration?
And 2. the engineer faces more to the front than at an angle?
What else?
One thing most people agree on, “they don’t like change.”
As a short line engineer I only ran tabletop controlled locomotives on rare occasions. I didn’t find them uncomfortable, but like everyone the familiar wins out over the new.
Facing the conductor on the locomotive left and staring straight ahead to run the train just seemed natural.
Two rebuilt former Conrail SD50s work on locals out of Norfolk Southern’s Muncie, Indiana yard numbered 6325 and 6319. Both retain their original cabs.