A Our collected evidence indicates that “caboose” takes a standard -s plural. The word caboose is a “count noun” and takes a normal count plural. For example: “To streamline operations, the railroads would like to permanently uncouple these little lookout cars from freight trains. ‘Cabooses are dead weight,’ says a vice president of a Western railroad. ‘They are inefficient and belong to a different era.’” John D. Williams, Wall Street Journal, March 18, 1982. “A Burlington Northern freight passes, and Brian calls my attention to the rear-end device that has replaced the cabooses.” Terry Pindell, “Making Tracks: An American Rail Odyssey,” 1990. – Neil S. Serven, associate editor, Merriam-Webster Inc.
Cabooses, not cabeese
| Last updated on November 3, 2020
Ask Trains from the June 2015 issue
say it right it is Brake Cabooses not Cabeese it does not sound right and it is misspelled.
About 1999, I got called in early (3AM) to help haul crews at Northtown. One of the trains had Conductor Steve Johnson. I told him, one caboose, two cabooses–why aren’t two cabooses cabeese? He look at me (after a six or so hour trip from Dilworth), laughed, and said I had two much time on my thoughts! I took him to the Hump Tower, dropped him off, and got some breakfast in order to be on duty at 7AM as Terml Supt’s Clerk.